For some beginner fishkeepers, "parasite"
is almost a synonym for "invertebrate."
Not for you, though. You've penetrated this
far, so I'm sure you're perfectly aware that
if you see a creature living free in the
aquarium, no matter how undesirable you may
find it (call that the "Eew Factor")--
it's not a parasite. If it's an invertebrate
that we admire and respect, you may be able
to find out more about it among "Invertebrates" in the menu at the left. Alas, we treat
other invertebrates callously as merely temporary
members of the community-- they get no respect
...because they're "Live Food!"
The third category of invertebrates, the
badboys that follow, are all parasites:
First, in this "Parasites: Protozoa" subfolder, you'll find the most common parasitic
single-cell protists; then, in the "Parasites: Invertebrates" subfolder that follows, a few of the most
common multicellular invertebrates that parasitize
fish: flatworms, which include flukes and
tapeworms, copepods-- which are minute crustaceans--
and a nasty intestinal nematode worm or two.
Not a complete roster of fish parasites by
any means, but if you get some understanding
of just a few parasites, you'll have the
practicalities of the situation pretty much
under control
Let me remind you again that I'm not a veterinarian.
I'm just passing on to you the best of what
I've read. Don't rely entirely on hobbyists
such as the Skeptical Aquarist: probe the
information that biologists offer to veterinarians
and aquaculturists. If you need more information,
or your fishes' problem isn't treated among
the few common parasites here, you need to
explore some of the links to fish diseases
on the Web. Begin with some of the wide-ranging
sites mentioned just below in the paragraph
Ich on the Web.
Parasites in general. Parasites have traded an easy life for steep
odds against finding a suitable host. In
the course of evolutionary time, intestinal
parasites like some flatworms or nematodes,
which are constantly bathed in absorbable
nutrients, can dispense with a digestive
system altogether. Instead, the parasite
concentrates its energy on producing eggs
or mobile young. The chances of finding a
suitable host are so slim that the female
of a common nematode of humans and horses,
Ascaris, produces 200,000 eggs-- not in a lifetime,
but in a day.
The crowded conditions of even a well-kept
aquarium multiply the chances of locating
a suitable host by several hundredfold. So
parasite loads that could be sustained under
natural conditions can multiply and overwhelm
the host fish in an aquarium.
Virulence is not in the parasite's own long-range
best interests. All parasites have co-evolved
with their natural hosts to a kind of cold-war
truce in the race to evolve new defenses.
A dead host may be the end of the line for
most of its parasites too. In the narrower
ecosystem that an aquarium defines, fishkeepers
themselves become a new Force of Nature!
If at first view, this seems like an extravagant
statement, consider it from this angle: a
minor, relatively harmless ciliate like Tetrahymena may thrive unharmed through many generations,
whereas a more destructive one like Ichthyophthirius-- once in captivity-- provokes destructive
changes in its environment, unleashed by
a furious aquarist.
Ich (Ichthyophthirius multifiliis. "multifilis" is an alternate spelling). Single-celled Ich is a ciliate, the one
that gives all ciliates a bad name. Most
ciliates are benign, and some are important
to the aquarist: for example, Paramecium,
beloved of high-school seniors, is the nutritious
ciliate that's a major component of infusoria.
Know your enemy. Be aware of Ich and other parasites as living
organisms rather than merely agents of disease
symptoms. Everyone struggles with infestations
of "Ick" as a beginner. Some continue
with cycle after cycle of Ich, a frustration
that should be avoidable. "Uncontrollable
or recurrent infestation with ciliate protozoans
are indicative of husbandry problems,"
the University of Florida Extension Service
tells you severely. Many of those whose fishes
are suffering with Ich don't even want to
know it's a ciliate, they just want remedies
to nuke it with! But resist that highlighted
link! it always pays to know your enemy!
Most problems with permanently eliminating
this parasite come from not understanding
its life cycle.
Ich has three life-stages. We can begin with the feeding stage that
has settled under your fishes' outer skin:
the trophont (or trophozoite). The trophont
is the only feeding stage (its name contains the same
Greek troph="feeding" element familiar in
"heterotroph" or "trophic
level"), yet it has no mouth. Instead
it secretes histolytes to break down neighboring
host cells, in order to absorb their contents.
The histolytes cause the host fishes' epithelium
to thicken, so that the host's own immune
reaction provides a safe haven for this "adult"
or "mature" stage, where it's protected
from medication. Constantly rotating inside
its pustule, the trophont swells to 50 times
its original size, large enough to appear
to the naked eye, grayish-white, round to
oval, as big as a grain of salt. In a few
days or much longer, depending on temperature,
it is ripe. It sheds its cilia, grows a thickened
gelatinous outer shell, lets itself be shed
into the fishes' mucus, and drops away as
a "tomont." The trophont does not
need to become completely mature. A lab study by T.A. Nicholl and M.S. Ewing at Oklahoma
State found that most of the embedded trophonts
left the host within four hours of death:
it's worth noting that the corpse of an Ich-infested
host is a major source of infection.
The released tomonts swim for 2 to 6 hours
before settling on a substrate. (Nicholl
and Ewing found that a light substrate was
preferred to a dark one.) Some biologists
count this brief interval as a fourth life
stage (in which it is susceptible to medication,
by the way, according to Dr. Peter Burgess,
the resident "fish doctor" at Practical Fishkeeping magazine). Quickly it attaches to a substrate
and encysts, as the reproducing stage. This
life-stage doesn't eat. Its metabolic clock
is now ticking; it is spending its stored
energy to divide and divide again within
the short-lived cyst. The tomont's time-span
remains temperature-dependent: at common
aquarium temperatures it's a matter of hours
to days. (In a chilly koi pond in early spring,
the cyst may persist longer.) Ultimately
hundreds of mobile tomites burst from the
cyst, even as many as 2000. They quick sprout
cilia and start actively swimming about in
search of a host. The fully developed "swarmers"
are now called theronts (Greek ther- denotes a critter). The tomites'/theronts'
metabolism is also temperature-dependent,
but they must find a host within a very few
days or perish: at 68oF none survived after 55 hours, according
to Schaperclaus.
The gelatinous thin-walled cyst can't survive
being completely dried out, an incentive
to let your nets dry out completely, if there
is Ich anywhere among your tanks. Only this
third life-stage, the free-swimming tomite/theront,
is susceptible to medications. Only the trophont
can persist "dormant" in the aquarium,
though it's never free-living but always
attached inconspicuously to a host, perhaps
on a gill surface.
Ich is all too easily identified with the
naked eye at the final full development of
the trophont. (In fact Ichthyophthirius multifiliis is the largest known single-celled parasite
on fishes.) As a result, many aquarists don't
want to believe Ich is attacking their fish
till they actually see the white spots. This is an error. Often
a spot or two pass unnoticed, since newly-settled
trophonts are too small to see anyway, and
especially since early infestations are likely
to attach to the gills, where they stay invisible
as they grow. If you wait until later stages,
badly infested small fishes may be too weakened
to save.
The other common error, once a medication
regime is begun, is that it's often ended
as soon as no more mature "white spot"
trophonts are visible in obvious places on
the fish. It's absolutely essential to keep on medicating till the last encysted
theront has released its tomites, and the
last tomite has been eliminated by the medication. Remember, it only takes a single tomite
successfully settled into the fishes' epithelium
to inaugurate a whole new cycle. As the University
of Florida puts it, once more, "Uncontrollable
or recurrent infestation with ciliate protozoans
are indicative of husbandry problems."
Treating Ich. First advice: Catch Ich early. If you notice fishes "flashing"
and scraping against rocks as if their gills
were being bitten, you have a strong presumption
that some external parasite is at work. Labored
breathing, loss of appetite, and listless
hiding are all signs of malaise that should
be danger signals that something is going
wrong for that fish. Don't wait for the matured
cysts to show on the fishes' fins and body.
I've recently read that at lowered temperatures
the vulnerable free-swimming stage can last
as long as 96 hours: that's four full days!
This might be a problem in a cool outdoor
pond, but rather than drag out stressful
treatment, you'll surely begin by raising the temperature in the aquarium. Adjusting the setting on
the heater will do the job; don't try to
raise or lower water temperatures faster
than a couple of degrees an hour. Higher
temperatures result in speeded-up metabolisms,
both for the parasite and for the fish. Above
a certain temperature (86oF is often quoted) the heat-sensitive parasite
will be stressed. Its life cycle is interfered
with, and it might even be killed. But if
the host fish is also stressed, high temperatures
can be counter-productive. You need to judge
your individual species' tolerance for heat;
a White Cloud Mountain Minnow or a Corydoras
will be more stressed by heat than a Discus.
Since at higher temperatures the water holds
less oxygen, you might want to lower the
water level enough to get some extra splash
from the filter return.
I understood long ago how the matured ciliate
dropped from the fish and settled on the
bottom, enclosed in a protective envelope
while it divides into tomite swarmers. But
I only recently understood that the theront
can settle out on anything: it doesn't have to be gravel or a stone
at the bottom: it can be a leaf or a speck
of detritus. In this way Ich can be introduced
with new plants taken from an infested aquarium,
a vector that could easily give the appearance
of spontaneous generation of Ich in an aquarium:
the Myth That Will Not Die. You can only
be sure this won't happen, if there are no
fish in the tank your plants came from. Have
you noticed that the very best LFS sell you
plants from well-lighted but fish-free tanks?
You can give new plants a bath with potassium
permanganate when you get them home, though
that's hard on their delicate tissues. Or,
better, just quarantine all new plants for
three days, making sure they get warmth and
plenty of light. Of course the free-swimming
tomite stage can also be introduced in apparently
uninfected new fishes' travelling water:
yet another reason to net out your new fishes,
after you've acclimatized them, and discard
the water.
The trophont or feeding stage attached to
the host is also temperature-sensitive. At
normal aquarium temperatures it matures in
three to four days. At cooler temperatures
the whole cycle can be slowed to more than
five weeks, as the frustrated pond-keeper
can tell you! Particularly resistant fishes
can remain asymptomatic through several cycles
of infestation and can act as "carriers"
of Ich. What happens is, the free-swimming
tomites attach most easily to the gills.
The rest of the fishes' skin is protected
by a sturdier mucus coating that's constantly
renewed, sloughing off all kinds of minute
organisms that might settle out. Trophonts
that are newly-attached to the epidermis
are invisibly small. So a "carrier"
fish is simply one that is invisibly carrying
Ich, perhaps on its gills. There is no "dormant" independent,
long-term encysted life stage separate from
a host fish for Ichthyophthirius multifiliis. This is useful to know. You will often hear
to the contrary. Dr. Peter Burgess, who took
Ichthyophthirius multifiliis as his Ph.D. subject at Plymouth University,
mentioned among Ich "old wives' tales"
that "It's present in all aquariums."
"What utter rubbish" noted Dr.
Burgess (in the Nov 2001 Practical Fishkeeping). Brits don't mince words.
Though they all follow the same life-pattern,
there are countless strains of Ich, some
harder to kill, some more virulent. Bad news
comes in from all over: Ich has traditionally
succumbed at temperatures over 85oF, but in the 1990s new Florida "strains"
were reported that could survive temperatures
as high as 90o, which might overstress most tropical fish.
In Oklahoma, university researchers studied
a closely-related ciliate, identified as
a "strain of Ich," in which the
reproducing stage doesn't drop away but remains
under the fishes' epidermis and releases
the tomites from that secure position. This
is a one-shot deal for the trophont, which
dies in the process. The free-swimming tomites/theronts
are still the only stage vulnerable to medication.
In this close relation of Ich, the lesions
are larger, looking like carp pox, flattened
and waxy appearing. (There is more at www.koivet.com )
Remedies. Though copper sulfate is used in fishponds, under controlled pH
levels, copper is too unstable in toxicity
to use in most freshwater aquaria. There
are two preferred aquarium techniques for
eliminating Ich. (These work against other
single-celled external parasites, such as
Oodinium, by the way.) One is a long-term salt bath, building up over the first eight hours
to a strength of one level teaspoon of common
table salt per net gallon of water (and for
some salt-tolerant freshwater fishes as much
as a tablespoon, the equivalent of three
teaspoons), at a temperature that is raised
over 86oF. Plain table salt won't affect the pH of
the water, but it must be strong enough:
the Southern Regional Aquaculture Center
reports a case of Ich withstanding a long-term
bath of 5 parts per thousand.
Many experienced fishkeepers swear by this
traditional salt bath. They prefer it to
the other technique, which is far more toxic:
a mixture of formalin and malachite green. Which brand you use doesn't matter; just
look for a medication that contains only
these two ingredients (such as Kordon's "Rid-Ich"
or Aquatronics' "Formalite II"
or Mardel's "Maracide"). But note
that these two ingredients are more powerful
in sync than they are separately. That's
what "synergy" is, eh! Read up
on formalin/malachite green at Fishdoc.
Formalin and malachite green, like potassium
permanganate and several other therapeutic
agents, react with dissolved organic carbon
in the aquatic system. In water that is loaded
with organics, their power can be mis-spent
on oxidizing organics rather than attacking
the protein and polypeptide surface coatings
of the disease-causing organisms. This has
the effect of lowering the effectiveness
of the dosage. So, once you've turned up
the thermostat on the heater, a thorough tank cleaning, to reduce the level of organics, is always
a wise second move, before any medicating
begins. People have often noticed that a
thorough gravel cleaning makes treatments
more effective; generally they ascribe the
effect to scooping up of microscopic Ich
theronts or tomites out of the gravel, but
perhaps the removal of organics is more essential.
I feel that rooting around in the gravel
to siphon out ciliates is like trying to
eliminate carpet mites with your vacuum cleaner:
though you may decimate the population, you
won't utterly eradicate them.
Potassium permanganate treatments are largely
ineffective in eliminating Ich once it is
encysted on the host fish. However, a USDA
Agricultural Research Service study in 2000,
"Prevention of an intitial infestation
of Ichthophthirius multifiliis..." found
that infestations of Ich could be prevented
in fish that had been experimentally exposed
to the the young Ich swarmers by treatment
with as little as 1.0 ppm potassium permanganate.
Successful treatment depends on the KMnO4 remaining reactive for four hours, and that
depends on the levels of dissolved organic
carbon.
Fishkeepers realize that some fishes in an
aquarium will remain uninfected in an epizootic.
So it's interesting to see that these USDA
researchers found that Channel Cats were
33 times more likely to become infected than
Blue Tilapia.
And, let me remind you again, before you
begin any medicating, to take the carbon out of your filter.
It's always a good idea, but especially if
you have fishes that may be sensitive to
medication, to build up towards the full dosage in increments, at three-hour intervals.
This holds good for salt baths too. Keep
an eagle-eyed watch for signs of distress
from heat and medication, such as increased
respiration rate. If you see the first signs
of stress, immediately do a 25% water change to reduce the dose
of medication. Don't overdose, but equally
don't stint on the length of medication,
with the thought of reducing stress, when
you're medicating sensitive fish.
Here's my most important advice: Continue the salt bath or medication three
days after you can find no Ich encysted on
any fish, not even the least bit of maybe a possible
one. You want to eliminate every encysted
tomont and especially that last stray swarmer.
It only takes one successfully lodged in
a gill to start the whole Ich cycle again
and convince you that Ich is always "lurking"
in the water. Afterwards do several good
big water changes, and then put fresh carbon
in the filter to adsorb any residual drugs.
Auxiliary weapons. You will soon notice-- from following the
links just below-- that there are several
supplementary weapons against this parasite,
none of which is utterly effective all on
its own. They include: micron filtering, or filtering through diatomaceous earth,
which traps many-- but not all-- the free-swimming tomites. The filtration
would be more effective if all the water in the tank were passed through
the filter before any of it were returned, but of course that's
out of the question in our re-circulating
systems. Do you see that some tomites would
always remain in the water if you really
depended solely on micron filtering to eliminate
the swarmers of Ich? Water changes that meticulously remove detritus do lower
the level of organics in the aquarium, and
heat does speed up the metabolism of the organism,
thus forcing it more rapidly through its
one vulnerable stage. Higher heat (above
86º) may stress the parasite. And finally,
during the malachite green and formalin medication,
darkness helps, because sunlight oxidizes malachite
green, making it less effective. I'm not
convinced that our aquarium lighting is sufficiently
intense to have any serious oxidizing effect.
A 1997 article in Tropical Fish Hobbyist seemed to have started a brief-lived cult
of attempting to cure Ich with complete darkness
alone. Not sensible, in my opinion, since
the creature is light-independent and doesn't
even have an eye-spot.
Ich on the Web. A good condensed description of Ich's three-stage
life cycle helps you know why you're "supposed"
to do thus-and-so to get rid of it: supplement
my description at "KoiVet". Though that is a pond and koi site, Dr.
Erik L. Johnson's discussion of fish parasites
applies to indoor tropical freshwater aquaria.
When he says "asymptomatic carriers
can sustain a population of Ich in a tank
or pond for an indefinite period," remember,
he means "unspecified" period,
not "infinite" period. Dr. Johnson
gives a good account of Ich treatment with
salt in koi ponds.
Doug Thamm's often-copied article, "Way more than you ever wanted to know
about Ich" makes easy reading. It's as complete as
it promises to be. Doug's recommendations
aren't invariably the standard ones: medicate
at the recommended dose, he tells us, but
repeat it every 3 or 4 days, for a total
of four treatments over 12 to 16 days, with
a 50% water change before each remedication.
Dr. Harry Dickerson's Ich Page at the University of Georgia's College of
Veterinary Medicine is very brief on the
life cycle of Ich, but has the web's best
electron micrographs of Ich in its various
stages.
Shawn Prescott's account of Ichthyophthirius is part of his "Diseases in Fish" series. Right after giving a good account of the
three-stage life cycle of this pesky ciliate,
however, he was a little too casual in referring
to a unspecified "latent" stage,
when I feel he might have done better referring
to "subclinical" or "asymptomatic"
carriers, or to low temperatures slowing
the cycle. But the color photomicrographs
are good.
The University of Florida's Institute of
Food and Agricultural Sciences weighs in
with a U.S.D.A.-sponsored article co-authored
by three Cooperative Extension agents, because
Ich is a major plague for Florida's commercial
ornamental and food fish farmers. So there's
good Ich material at the UofF/IFAS site. Click on "Livestock, Pets, Fish and
Wildlife" then drill down through "Fish"
and "Fish Health" to the document
"Introduction to Freshwater Fish Parasites"
--excellent in itself-- which contains a
link to a more detailed document, "Extension
Circular 920: "Ichthyophthirius multifiliis
White Spot Infection of Fish." (More
direct links aren't dependable, but this
document is worth the goose chase. This document
is also archived at the Southern Regional
Aquaculture Center http://aquanic.org/publicat/usda_rac/efs/srac/476fs.pdf
and might be more easily retrievable there.)
It describes in detail Ich's appearance (with
color pix), its life cycle and methods of
prevention and treatments that reflect a
fish-farming rather than an aquarium perspective:
for example, malachite green remains too
long in fish tissues for it to be used with
food fish, like Channel Catfish, and it's
too toxic in powder form to be used in outdoor
ponds. And though unstable reactions of copper
sulfate in unbuffered, soft water aren't
a considerable issue when dealing with Florida's
typically alkaline water, they might cause
future problems for fishkeepers with soft
water and flexible pH. Treatments using potassium
permanganate and sodium chloride are also
described. From three to seven repeat treatments
are recommended, to catch each generation
of swarmers.
Another accurate capsule biography of Ich
is at the Kordon website, data sheet #57, (scroll the menu down for
it): "The life cycle of Ich."
At Loaches on Line there is now a downloadable database concerning
Ich, with some pro and con concerning copper.
Begin at the section "Disease Treatments."
You might want to read the 1967 description
of the parasite from Dr. C. van Duijn, Jr.,
Diseases of Fish, which holds up well, though its no-longer-recommendable
medications include quinine and methylene
blue, even atebrine. Keep your cautious reserve
while you're reading the postings relating
pros and cons of copper medications at this
site and at others: no one seems to note
the pH of their water when reporting success
with copper compounds.
Ich myth. ...now you have no excuse for imagining
that Ich has a dry spore stage that gets
blown through the air and settles on the
water, or that it can be transported in an
aerosol mist or on a net that has air-dried
overnight: "its spores are everywhere.
in your tank. on your hands" writes
a respected and usually knowledgable aquarist
...but you have no excuse for fearing that
Ich is always lurking in your tank water,
or even in your drinking water, or that it
lies low in the gravel, dormant but just
waiting for a cold spell to burst into action,
etc etc... all Beemer: Bogus Misinformation
Endlessly Repeated. Most Beemer isn't pure
invention, but is based on some misinterpretation
or mis-hearing of fact. If you keep a steady
grip on the facts of Ichthyophthirius life stages, you may even be able to disentangle
the particular misunderstanding that's at
the root of each particular Ich myth.
At the very least, please keep comparing
stuff that you will be hearing with what
you know. ...and don't just take the word
of the Skeptical Aquarist!
The "dormant Ich" myth. In 1965, Dr. H. Reichenbach-Klinke could
write, in the English translation of Krankheiten der Aquarienfische, (Stuttgart 1957),
"We know as yet nothing about possible
sexual reproduction in this species, nor
does it seem to produce resting forms of
any kind. Deviations from the described cycle
may occur... young parasites may divide while
on the fish, or mature forms, swimming free
in the water, may produce swarmers without
having been encysted."
Dr. Herbert R. Axelrod bought the rights
to the English translation of Reichenbach-Klinke's
book and distributed an unre-edited photo
reproduction of the text through his publishing
company, TFH. But some years later, when
he had a chance to oversee the translation
and take a more active hand in editing Dieter
Untergasser's Handbook of Fish Diseases (distributed by TFH, 1989), he added a figure
(fig. 83) captioned "the vicious Ich
cycle." This figure purports to show
an alternate cycle for Ichthyophthirius multifiliis : "G. The [daughter cells] leave fish
which have died. H. Two to three days later
mature parasites mate (conjugation) for sexual
reproduction. I. They produce cysts which
can live for several weeks in the aquarium
without finding a host."
What's up with this? The figure is one of
two in the book that are drawn by a different,
coarser hand than the rest of the illustrations.
They seem to have been added to the illustrations
originally made for Untergasser's book. The
inserted caption I've quoted intrudes a note
of spurious science that is not reflected
in the text. You see, it's possible to be
so sure of some conception that one is willing,
perhaps only semi-consciously, to "bend
the facts" a little, to fit the pre-conceived
idea. The result is a "pious fraud,"
defended by high intentions.
It's possible that the myth of Ich "lying
low" in the aquarium in an imagined
"dormant" stage, may have come
from confusing Ichthyophthirius multifiliis with a similar marine ciliate parasite called
Cryptocaryon irritans. People like to call Cryptocaryon "Ich's
marine counterpart." In marine aquaria,
I'm told, Cryptocaryon (which means "hidden
spore") can remain infective for up
to thirty days, especially at low temperatures!
If this is true, it's an insidious parasite,
and much more difficult to eliminate than
our familiar freshwater ciliate. But perhaps
a habit of confusing the two-- by calling
them each other's "counterparts"--
has helped create the myth of a counterpart
"dormant" life stage for Ichthyophthirius multifiliis.
Imagine a comparable situation among some
more familiar organisms, like mammals. If
you called sea otters the marine "counterparts"
of the giant Amazonian river otters, then
you might expect to find that the river otters
would lie on their backs in the river water,
cracking shellfish on stones which they carry
on their bellies. But they don't; and they
don't eat sea urchins like their marine "counterparts"
either. "Counterpart," you see,
is not a dependable category in the real
world of animals. Not that it doesn't have
a long history. Medieval thinkers expanded
on some hints that they read in Roman natural
history writers to imagine that every terrestrial
creature had its "counterpart"
in the sea. Part of the symmetry that made
Creation perfect... But that's getting a
long way from the fish tank...
Published misinformation. We all tend to repeat what we keep hearing
and copy what we've read, without subjecting
the information to skeptical review. Plenty
of bold, authoritative-sounding BMER gets
published. I can't tell you how much more
authoritative this section on Ich looks,
presented here in this modern sans-serif
font, than it did in my written notes...
In summer 2000, a (nameless) widely-read
aquarium magazine printed an article so dis-spiritingly
packed with Beemer concerning Ich, all in
all so carelessly promoting such a recipe
for a reader's future endlessly soured by
cycle after cycle of Ich epidemics, that
I just have to take it apart, for your sake.
(By the time you've scrolled down this far,
I figure you've followed the links to some
dependable accounts, and you're well clued-up
on the life-style of Ichthyophthirius multifiliis.)
Selection of fish. In the article I'm looking
at, first you're advised, when buying fish,
to "select only those that appear healthy...
Examine the tank for dead fish and avoid
purchasing from such tanks, unless you are
confidant of the condition of the live specimens."
Confidant? Fools rush in where angels fear to tread!
Don't ever imagine you're buying a "healthy"
fish from a tank that has any infected fishes, let alone dead ones.
Quarantine. This writer undercuts the very
idea of quarantine by telling you that "for
years I added fish purchased at local fish
shops directly to my tanks. 99% of the time these transfers
resulted in no outbreaks of Ich..."
The author describes this "optional"
quarantine as "a period of one to two
weeks." Two weeks' time is just not
long enough for newly-settled Ich to become
visible.
Preventive intervention. "Some fishkeepers
treat the quarantine tank with a low dosage
of medication as a preventative measure."
Preventive intervention is an excellent idea.
Anyone who keeps turtles, snakes and lizards
just takes it for granted that new purchases
are harboring parasites, and they medicate
to eliminate them. I think fishkeepers might
do well to follow their example. Preventive
intervention is especially recommendable
if the fish are wild-caught. But a "low
dosage" is a soft-headed idea. What
is this medication for? Is this to be a fully
effective treatment, or a magic gesture done
just for good luck? Low dosage of any medication
tends to spare precisely those organisms
most resistant to the medication. It's the
"low dosage" aspect that can make
preventive intervention appear useless.
"Parasites can exist in a healthy tank
and not show their presence until a fish
is weakened and susceptible." This is
almost true. The fact is that Ich ciliates
can exist on a healthy-appearing host individual, and not show their presence, even for many
weeks at cooler temperatures, or for several
inconspicuous life-cycles on the gills of
a resistant host. But Ich has no long-term
"dormant" stage at large in the
aquarium. Undaunted, this writer goes on:
"Outbreaks of Ich, blamed on the addition
of new animals with an alleged unseen condition,
may be incorrect (sic). The reason for an outbreak may be due
to another factor." The writer goes
on to imply that "an overstressed biological
system" and crowding can result in elevated
levels of toxic metabolites, increased stress
and weakened fish. This is the "don't
go out without your rubbers or you'll catch
your death of a chill" school of epidemiology.
I'm sure you understand that Ichthyophthirius is an organism. It is the vector of this
disease. Stressed fishes may indeed be more
vulnerable to many parasites, but if I. multifiliis is not present, they can't come down with
"Ich." Not understanding this,
the author of the article expends great care
on equalizing temperatures when transfering
fish to the tank, caution that might have
been better spent performing a quarantine.
Let me offer a parallel: Malaria is not the
result of a swampy miasma of mal aria or "bad air;" it has a vector,
and that vector is a blood parasite carried
by a mosquito. Carefully closing the window
shutters at night to keep out the mal aria might be effective-- or quite in vain.
It all depends, not on the nighttime mal aria, but on whether there is an infective mosquito
already in the room.
Then for treatment I'm reading this: "Simply
transfer the infected fish to the hospital
tank and begin treatment... thus not exposing
healthy specimens or live plants to unnecessary
treatment and stress." Ai, ai ai! That means that only the fishes with big
white spots get treated. The others remain
to infect one another-- until they develop
visible white spots too, presumably. Do you
see how the impression can get established
that Ich is somehow everpresent, lurking
dormant in the aquarium?
There's worse yet: "in a pinch"
you are directed to place the diseased fish
in a plastic hang-on-the tank filter-box
floated in the main tank. Oh no! "The box can then be medicated without
exposing the whole tank." You'd never
do this, I'm sure. You know how important
it is to avoid cross-contamination among
a show aquarium, a Q-tank and a hospital
tank. By now you also realise that the "whole
tank" is already exposed to the parasite
and must be considered to be in Quarantine,
at the very least.
This author also approves the addition of
a tablespoon of salt per gallon, harmless
enough, but certainly not enough to eliminate
Ich. "Increasing the water temperature
to 84o to 89oF has been noted to be an effective treatment,"
says this writer, but I hope you wouldn't
count on that as sufficient just on its own.
Diatomaceous earth filtration and UV sterilizing
techniques both get approving passing references
in this article, as if they could eliminate
Ich in a recirculating system.
This was an egregious example of Bogus Misinformation
Endlessly Repeated, but be on guard for little
snippets of Beemer in otherwise dependable
contexts. For instance, an aquarist whom
I admire recently advised a fishkeeper who
had a tank where two goldfish had died of
Ich, but which had run a month without any fish
in it, "If the disease is still present, the
parasite can bloom when the new fish are
added." Nevertheless, his advice began
well: "Don't chance a reinfection by
simply putting more fish in the tank,"
but then, instead of recommending a quarantine,
he recommended disinfecting the fish-free
tank by running a regime of anti-parasite
medication in it.
Acquired resistance to Ich. When Ich strikes, often there will be some
fishes in the community that won't be affected.
Recently, research at Cornell is confirming
the long-held hunch of many aquarists that,
once an individual fish has been cured of
Ich, it has acquired some level of immunity
(see the "Defenses/Immunity" page
in this folder).